FACO
Price
$3.41
Change
-$0.15 (-4.21%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
125.04M
TRRSF
Price
$27.39
Change
-$0.46 (-1.65%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FACO vs TRRSF

Header iconFACO vs TRRSF Comparison
Open Charts FACO vs TRRSFBanner chart's image
First Acceptance
Price$3.41
Change-$0.15 (-4.21%)
Volume$1.81K
Capitalization125.04M
Trisura Group
Price$27.39
Change-$0.46 (-1.65%)
Volume$1.82K
Capitalization1.31B
FACO vs TRRSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FACO vs. TRRSF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACO is a Hold and TRRSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FACO: $3.41 vs. TRRSF: $27.39)
Brand notoriety: FACO and TRRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FACO: 35% vs. TRRSF: 3%
Market capitalization -- FACO: $125.04M vs. TRRSF: $1.31B
FACO [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $125.04M. TRRSF’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FACO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRRSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FACO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FACO is a better buy in the long-term than TRRSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FACO’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRRSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FACO’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TRRSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRRSF is a better buy in the short-term than FACO.

Price Growth

FACO (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -3.86% price change this week, while TRRSF (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -7.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-0.91% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRRSF($1.31B) has a higher market cap than FACO($125M). TRRSF has higher P/E ratio than FACO: TRRSF (15.16) vs FACO (5.50). FACO YTD gains are higher at: 12.607 vs. TRRSF (0.403). TRRSF has more cash in the bank: 1.52B vs. FACO (401M). FACO has less debt than TRRSF: FACO (45.2M) vs TRRSF (158M). TRRSF has higher revenues than FACO: TRRSF (839M) vs FACO (522M).
FACOTRRSFFACO / TRRSF
Capitalization125M1.31B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.6070.4033,127%
P/E Ratio5.5015.1636%
Revenue522M839M62%
Total Cash401M1.52B26%
Total Debt45.2M158M29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FACO vs TRRSF: Fundamental Ratings
FACO
TRRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1429
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2962
SMR RATING
1..100
5554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
485
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FACO's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as TRRSF (86). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRRSF (62). This means that FACO’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TRRSF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FACO (55). This means that TRRSF’s stock grew similarly to FACO’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as TRRSF (61). This means that FACO’s stock grew similarly to TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

FACO's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRRSF (85). This means that FACO’s stock grew significantly faster than TRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FACOTRRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FACO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENPIX42.05N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraSector Energy Investor
DAFGX42.33N/A
N/A
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth A
DIAYX30.83N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Long-Short Y
IMEGX23.45N/A
N/A
Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq R6
FPADX13.40N/A
N/A
Fidelity Emerging Markets Idx

FACO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACO and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACO and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACO
1D Price
Change %
FACO100%
-4.26%
HIPO - FACO
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
TRRSF - FACO
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
LCSHF - FACO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZLYF - FACO
5%
Poorly correlated
+6.31%
JTGPF - FACO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRRSF and RDN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRRSF and RDN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRRSF
1D Price
Change %
TRRSF100%
-1.65%
RDN - TRRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
ESNT - TRRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
FNF - TRRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
TIPT - TRRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-15.21%
MTG - TRRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More