Ad is loading...
FACPX vs FSCPX
FACPX vs FSCPX Comparison
Open Charts FACPX vs FSCPX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret M
Price$35.26
Change+$0.28 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets432.07M
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port
Price$55.74
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets468.29M
FACPX vs FSCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FACPX vs. FSCPX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACPX is a Buy and FSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 468M vs. FACPX (432M). FSCPX pays higher dividends than FACPX: FSCPX (0.07) vs FACPX (0.00). FACPX was incepted earlier than FSCPX: FACPX (29 years) vs FSCPX (35 years). FACPX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.70). FSCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FACPX (25.00). FACPX (0) and FSCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FACPX (500) and FSCPX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FACPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.73 vs. FSCPX (-8.47). FACPX return over 5 years is better than : 45.87 vs. FSCPX (33.41).
| FACPX | FSCPX | FACPX / FSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.70 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.70 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.003 | -17.968 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 432M | 468M | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.73 | -8.47 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.30 | 1.64 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.87 | 33.41 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.11 | 60.54 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers