Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FACPX vs FSRPX
FACPX vs FSRPX Comparison
Open Charts FACPX vs FSRPX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret M
Price$42.55
Change+$0.44 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets489.14M
Fidelity Select Retailing
Price$19.90
Change+$0.07 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.7B
FACPX vs FSRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FACPX vs. FSRPX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACPX is a Buy and FSRPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.7B vs. FACPX (489M). FSRPX pays higher dividends than FACPX: FSRPX (0.13) vs FACPX (0.00). FACPX was incepted earlier than FSRPX: FACPX (29 years) vs FSRPX (40 years). FACPX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.66). FSRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FACPX (25.00). FACPX (0) and FSRPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FACPX (500) and FSRPX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FACPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. FSRPX (3.29). FACPX return over 5 years is better than : 36.73 vs. FSRPX (0.39).
| FACPX | FSRPX | FACPX / FSRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.66 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.66 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.258 | -2.785 | 9% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 489M | 2.7B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 3.29 | 362% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.14 | 17.50 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.73 | 0.39 | 9,517% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.02 | 98.51 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement