Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FACSX vs JVMCX
FACSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FACSX vs JVMCX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value 1 C
Price$49.22
Change+$0.09 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets382.33M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$25.98
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.57B
FACSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FACSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.6B vs. FACSX (382M). FACSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FACSX (0.19) vs JVMCX (0.00). FACSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FACSX (26 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). FACSX (1.97) and JVMCX (1.88) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FACSX (20.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FACSX: JVMCX (1000) vs FACSX (2500). FACSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. JVMCX (-3.78). FACSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. JVMCX (45.98).
| FACSX | JVMCX | FACSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.87 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.88 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.756 | 2.688 | -65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 382M | 21.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.42 | -3.78 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.13 | 18.06 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.02 | 45.98 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.05 | 25.47 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers