Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FACSX vs JVMCX
FACSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FACSX vs JVMCX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Opportunities C
Price$52.17
Change+$0.31 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets398.99M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.40
Change+$0.14 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.6B
FACSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FACSX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. FACSX (399M). FACSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FACSX (0.18) vs JVMCX (0.00). FACSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FACSX (26 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). FACSX (1.97) and JVMCX (1.88) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FACSX (20.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FACSX: JVMCX (1000) vs FACSX (2500). FACSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.09 vs. JVMCX (1.34). FACSX return over 5 years is better than : 65.23 vs. JVMCX (57.69).
| FACSX | JVMCX | FACSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.87 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.88 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.034 | 7.747 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 399M | 22.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 1.34 | 305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.49 | 20.85 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.23 | 57.69 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.07 | 34.04 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers