Ad is loading...
FACSX vs JVMCX
FACSX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FACSX vs JVMCX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value 1 C
Price$47.91
Change+$0.46 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets376.88M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$24.88
Change+$0.24 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.63B
FACSX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FACSX vs. JVMCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACSX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 20.6B vs. FACSX (377M). FACSX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FACSX (0.20) vs JVMCX (0.00). FACSX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FACSX (26 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). FACSX (1.97) and JVMCX (1.88) have similar cost to investors . JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FACSX (20.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FACSX: JVMCX (1000) vs FACSX (2500). FACSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.88 vs. JVMCX (-9.51). FACSX return over 5 years is better than : 58.67 vs. JVMCX (46.17).
| FACSX | JVMCX | FACSX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.87 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.88 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.289 | -2.609 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 377M | 20.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | -9.51 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.93 | 2.43 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.67 | 46.17 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.15 | 19.98 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers