FACT
Price
$10.30
Change
+$0.02 (+0.19%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
157.3M
HCMAU
Price
$10.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FACT vs HCMAU

Header iconFACT vs HCMAU Comparison
Open Charts FACT vs HCMAUBanner chart's image
Fact II Acquisition
Price$10.30
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
Volume$148.69K
Capitalization157.3M
Hcm III Acquisition
Price$10.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$90.13K
CapitalizationN/A
FACT vs HCMAU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FACT vs. HCMAU commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACT is a StrongBuy and HCMAU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FACT: $10.30 vs. HCMAU: $10.12)
Brand notoriety: FACT and HCMAU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FACT: 158% vs. HCMAU: 4%
Market capitalization -- FACT: $157.3M vs. HCMAU: $0
FACT [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $157.3M. HCMAU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FACT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMAU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FACT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCMAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FACT is a better buy in the long-term than HCMAU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FACT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FACT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FACT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while HCMAU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +89.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.09% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMAU (-4.83M) and FACT (-4.83M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . HCMAU has more cash in the bank: 79.1K vs. FACT (47.5K). HCMAU has less debt than FACT: HCMAU (1.26M) vs FACT (2.77M). FACT (0) and HCMAU (0) have equivalent revenues.
FACTHCMAUFACT / HCMAU
Capitalization157MN/A-
EBITDA-4.83M-4.83M100%
Gain YTD4.040N/A-
P/E Ratio1000.00N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash47.5K79.1K60%
Total Debt2.77M1.26M221%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FACT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
2%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
9%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
13%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
3%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUBCY19.250.06
+0.31%
Subsea 7 S.A.
AMBK15.25N/A
N/A
American Bank, Inc.
LNCLF0.12N/A
N/A
Lincoln Gold Mng Inc.
NPSGF3.50N/A
N/A
Nippon Sheet Glass Co., Ltd.
VNNVF30.50N/A
N/A
VONOVIA SE

FACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACT and MTAL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACT and MTAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACT
1D Price
Change %
FACT100%
+0.19%
MTAL - FACT
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
PLMIU - FACT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORT - FACT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTAF - FACT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RILYL - FACT
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
More

HCMAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMAU has been loosely correlated with PLMIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCMAU jumps, then PLMIU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMAU
1D Price
Change %
HCMAU100%
N/A
PLMIU - HCMAU
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FACT - HCMAU
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
CMCAF - HCMAU
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SZZLU - HCMAU
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLUF - HCMAU
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More