FACT
Price
$10.04
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
157.3M
PORT
Price
$11.47
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
75.08M
Ad is loading...

FACT vs PORT

Header iconFACT vs PORT Comparison
Open Charts FACT vs PORTBanner chart's image
Fact II Acquisition
Price$10.04
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$100.01K
Capitalization157.3M
Southport Acquisition
Price$11.47
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$221
Capitalization75.08M
FACT vs PORT Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FACT vs. PORT commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACT is a StrongBuy and PORT is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FACT: $10.04 vs. PORT: $11.47)
Brand notoriety: FACT and PORT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FACT: 202% vs. PORT: 112%
Market capitalization -- FACT: $157.3M vs. PORT: $75.08M
FACT [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $157.3M. PORT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $75.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FACT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePORT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FACT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PORT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FACT and PORT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

FACT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while PORT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +1.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

PORT is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.29% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FACT($157M) has a higher market cap than PORT($75.1M). FACT has higher P/E ratio than PORT: FACT (1000.00) vs PORT (39.96). PORT YTD gains are higher at: 2.962 vs. FACT (1.414). FACT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.83M vs. PORT (-12.02M). PORT has more cash in the bank: 2.35M vs. FACT (47.5K). PORT has less debt than FACT: PORT (60.2K) vs FACT (2.77M). FACT (0) and PORT (0) have equivalent revenues.
FACTPORTFACT / PORT
Capitalization157M75.1M209%
EBITDA-4.83M-12.02M40%
Gain YTD1.4142.96248%
P/E Ratio1000.0039.962,502%
Revenue00-
Total Cash47.5K2.35M2%
Total Debt2.77M60.2K4,608%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSLS0.460.01
+2.22%
ReShape Lifesciences Inc
QVCGB6.860.05
+0.73%
QVC Group Inc.
ALLY32.12-0.88
-2.67%
Ally Financial
WOOF2.86-0.08
-2.72%
Petco Health and Wellness Company
TGNA16.02-1.07
-6.26%
TEGNA

FACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACT and ZAPP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACT and ZAPP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACT
1D Price
Change %
FACT100%
-0.15%
ZAPP - FACT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
MTAL - FACT
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.64%
PLMIU - FACT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORT - FACT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTAF - FACT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PORT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PORT has been loosely correlated with YOTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PORT jumps, then YOTA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PORT
1D Price
Change %
PORT100%
N/A
YOTA - PORT
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
BEEP - PORT
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.61%
PWUPU - PORT
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTUF - PORT
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCAF - PORT
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More