Ad is loading...
FACVX vs FTCVX
FACVX vs FTCVX Comparison
Open Charts FACVX vs FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Secs A
Price$32.34
Change+$0.42 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Secs M
Price$32.41
Change+$0.42 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
FACVX vs FTCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FACVX vs. FTCVX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FACVX is a Buy and FTCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FACVX (1.76B) and FTCVX (1.76B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FACVX pays higher dividends than FTCVX: FACVX (3.01) vs FTCVX (2.75). FACVX was incepted earlier than FTCVX: FACVX (16 years) vs FTCVX (16 years). FTCVX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FACVX (0.99). FACVX (70.00) and FTCVX (70.00) have comparable annual turnover. FACVX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTCVX (4%) vs FTCVX (4%). FACVX (0) and FTCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FACVX (500) and FTCVX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FACVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.49 vs. FTCVX (2.25). FACVX return over 5 years is better than : 19.87 vs. FTCVX (18.42).
| FACVX | FTCVX | FACVX / FTCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.24 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.24 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.816 | -5.863 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 1.76B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 2.75 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | 2.25 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.99 | 3.23 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.87 | 18.42 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.24 | 16.11 | 119% |