FAD | IWP | FAD / IWP | |
Gain YTD | 2.122 | 6.043 | 35% |
Net Assets | 282M | 18.7B | 2% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.23 | 270% |
Turnover | 115.00 | 35.00 | 329% |
Yield | 0.54 | 0.37 | 146% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
FAD | IWP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 3 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 9 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago86% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SQQQ | 22.99 | 0.51 | +2.27% |
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | |||
PGRO | 38.92 | -0.20 | -0.52% |
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | |||
MHI | 9.10 | -0.05 | -0.55% |
Pioneer Municipal High Income Fund | |||
DFND | 42.75 | -0.30 | -0.70% |
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | |||
GDLC | 43.85 | -0.79 | -1.77% |
Grayscale Digital Large Cap Fund LLC |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FAD | 100% | -0.04% | ||
CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IWP | 100% | -0.51% | ||
ARES - IWP | 82% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
APO - IWP | 81% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
KKR - IWP | 80% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
MKSI - IWP | 79% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
JEF - IWP | 79% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
More |