Ad is loading...
FAD vs IWP
FAD vs IWP Comparison
Open Charts FAD vs IWP
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$124.22
Change-$7.70 (-5.84%)
Volume$3.21K
Net Assets218.04M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$113.23
Change-$7.33 (-6.08%)
Volume$800
Net Assets17.05B
FAD vs IWP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAD vs. IWP commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAD is a Hold and IWP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 17.1B vs. FAD (218M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than FAD: IWP (-4.798) vs FAD (-10.120). FAD was incepted earlier than IWP: FAD (18 years) vs IWP (24 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than FAD (0.62). FAD has a higher turnover IWP (35.00) vs IWP (35.00).
| FAD | IWP | FAD / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | -10.120 | -4.798 | 211% |
| Net Assets | 218M | 17.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.23 | 270% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 35.00 | 329% |
| Yield | 0.58 | 0.42 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAD | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAD | 100% | -5.84% | ||
| CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | -8.64% | ||
| WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.63% | ||
| APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | -12.77% | ||
| NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | -9.23% | ||
| AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | -8.98% | ||
More | ||||
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | +1.71% | ||
| ARES - IWP | 73% Closely correlated | +3.39% | ||
| EXP - IWP | 72% Closely correlated | +3.39% | ||
| KKR - IWP | 70% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| AWI - IWP | 69% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| HUBB - IWP | 69% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
More | ||||