Ad is loading...
FAD vs IWP
FAD vs IWP Comparison
Open Charts FAD vs IWP
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$138.43
Change-$0.15 (-0.11%)
Volume$2.08K
Net Assets263.23M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$134.19
Change+$0.53 (+0.40%)
Volume$584.26K
Net Assets18.64B
FAD vs IWP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAD vs. IWP commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAD is a Buy and IWP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 18.6B vs. FAD (263M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than FAD: IWP (5.957) vs FAD (0.161). FAD was incepted earlier than IWP: FAD (18 years) vs IWP (24 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than FAD (0.62). FAD has a higher turnover IWP (35.00) vs IWP (35.00).
| FAD | IWP | FAD / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | 0.161 | 5.957 | 3% |
| Net Assets | 263M | 18.6B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.23 | 270% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 35.00 | 329% |
| Yield | 0.58 | 0.40 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAD | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAD | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||