Ad is loading...
FAD vs IWP
FAD vs IWP Comparison
Open Charts FAD vs IWP
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$145.89
Change-$0.21 (-0.14%)
Volume$2.51K
Net Assets233.36M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$135.17
Change+$0.66 (+0.49%)
Volume$35.65K
Net Assets18.52B
FAD vs IWP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAD vs. IWP commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAD is a Hold and IWP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 18.5B vs. FAD (233M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than FAD: IWP (6.667) vs FAD (5.559). FAD was incepted earlier than IWP: FAD (18 years) vs IWP (24 years). FAD has a higher turnover IWP (26.00) vs IWP (26.00).
| FAD | IWP | FAD / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | 5.559 | 6.667 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 233M | 18.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 125.00 | 26.00 | 481% |
| Yield | 0.35 | 0.47 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAD | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 85% | 16 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 73% | 16 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 84% | 18 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 77% | 24 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 71% | 16 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAD | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.86% | ||
More | ||||
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| EXP - IWP | 72% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| KKR - IWP | 72% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| HUBB - IWP | 70% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| PTC - IWP | 68% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| CPRT - IWP | 67% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||