Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAD vs MDYG
FAD vs MDYG Comparison
Open Charts FAD vs MDYG
First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$162.09
Change+$0.85 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.45M
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
Price$92.11
Change+$0.92 (+1.01%)
Volume$200
Net Assets2.44B
FAD vs MDYG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAD vs. MDYG commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAD is a Buy and MDYG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.44B vs. FAD (438M). FAD has a higher annual dividend yield than MDYG: FAD (16.776) vs MDYG (5.561). FAD was incepted earlier than MDYG: FAD (18 years) vs MDYG (20 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FAD (0.62). FAD has a higher turnover MDYG (51.00) vs MDYG (51.00).
| FAD | MDYG | FAD / MDYG | |
| Gain YTD | 16.776 | 5.561 | 302% |
| Net Assets | 438M | 2.44B | 18% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.15 | 413% |
| Turnover | 115.00 | 51.00 | 225% |
| Yield | 0.28 | 0.78 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAD | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 76% | 14 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAD has been loosely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAD jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAD | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| CAT - FAD | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| WAB - FAD | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| APO - FAD | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| NTNX - FAD | 45% Loosely correlated | -5.94% | ||
| AMZN - FAD | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 86% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| JHG - MDYG | 86% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| FLS - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
More | ||||