Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FADCX vs RERBX
FADCX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts FADCX vs RERBX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl C
Price$27.61
Change+$0.30 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$57.70
Change+$0.70 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.4B
FADCX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FADCX vs. RERBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FADCX is a Buy and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FADCX (1.52B). FADCX pays higher dividends than RERBX: FADCX (0.70) vs RERBX (0.25). FADCX was incepted earlier than RERBX: FADCX (27 years) vs RERBX (23 years). FADCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FADCX (33.00). FADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: FADCX (0) vs RERBX (250). FADCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. RERBX (11.71). FADCX return over 5 years is better than : 13.06 vs. RERBX (7.66).
| FADCX | RERBX | FADCX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.56 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.56 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.110 | 13.471 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 132B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.25 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | 11.71 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.63 | 21.60 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.06 | 7.66 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.66 | 20.43 | 170% |