Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFFX vs RBKTX
FAFFX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFFX vs. RBKTX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFFX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 49.9B vs. FAFFX (2.96B). FAFFX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FAFFX (1.10) vs RBKTX (0.51). FAFFX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FAFFX (22 years) vs RBKTX (19 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FAFFX (0.92). FAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). FAFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: FAFFX (0) vs RBKTX (250). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.20 vs. FAFFX (7.99). RBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.56 vs. FAFFX (29.77).
| FAFFX | RBKTX | FAFFX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.45 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.45 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.485 | 15.524 | 80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.96B | 49.9B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.51 | 217% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.99 | 11.20 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.79 | 49.97 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.77 | 36.56 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.12 | 83.41 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers