Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFGX vs HSUCX
FAFGX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts FAFGX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
Price$86.22
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$31.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.99M
FAFGX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. HSUCX (63M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: FAFGX (0.49) vs HSUCX (0.00). FAFGX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: FAFGX (5 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.40). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. FAFGX (25.00). FAFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: FAFGX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). FAFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. HSUCX (-1.13). FAFGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.71 vs. HSUCX (-13.51).
| FAFGX | HSUCX | FAFGX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.027 | -2.105 | -761% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 63M | 519,048% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | -1.13 | -641% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 46.12 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.71 | -13.51 | -272% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -17.72 | - |