Ad is loading...
FAFGX vs HSUCX
FAFGX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts FAFGX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
Price$66.78
Change-$3.98 (-5.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$29.07
Change-$1.29 (-4.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.71M
FAFGX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. HSUCX (70.7M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: FAFGX (0.62) vs HSUCX (0.00). FAFGX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: FAFGX (4 years) vs HSUCX (11 years). HSUCX (2.23) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.40). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 194.00 vs. FAFGX (25.00). FAFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: FAFGX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. FAFGX (0.46).
| FAFGX | HSUCX | FAFGX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.23 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.23 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.777 | -6.006 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 70.7M | 396,040% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.46 | 6.38 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.41 | 8.78 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 35.54 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -84.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...