Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFGX vs NWAUX
FAFGX vs NWAUX Comparison
Open Charts FAFGX vs NWAUX
FAFGX vs NWAUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWAUX (394M). NWAUX pays higher dividends than FAFGX: NWAUX (2.26) vs FAFGX (0.43). FAFGX was incepted earlier than NWAUX: FAFGX (6 years) vs NWAUX (5 years). NWAUX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.38). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.65 vs. FAFGX (32.00). FAFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: FAFGX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). FAFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. NWAUX (0.93). NWAUX return over 5 years is better than : 35.87 vs. FAFGX (17.84).
| FAFGX | NWAUX | FAFGX / NWAUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.89 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.98 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.877 | 5.674 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 394M | 91,624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 2.26 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 0.93 | 685% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.79 | 23.19 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.84 | 35.87 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement