Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFGX vs RDLAX
FAFGX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts FAFGX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
Price$86.22
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.30
Change-$0.13 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.04M
FAFGX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFGX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. RDLAX (309M). FAFGX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: FAFGX (0.49) vs RDLAX (0.00). FAFGX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: FAFGX (5 years) vs RDLAX (19 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FAFGX (0.40). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FAFGX (25.00). FAFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: FAFGX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). FAFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. RDLAX (5.85). FAFGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.54 vs. RDLAX (11.11).
| FAFGX | RDLAX | FAFGX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.06 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.17 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.408 | 14.100 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 309M | 105,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.44 | 5.85 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.76 | 49.82 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.54 | 11.11 | 320% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.22 | - |