Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFJX vs FSHAX
FAFJX vs FSHAX Comparison
Open Charts FAFJX vs FSHAX
Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond C
Price$10.96
Change+$0.05 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.66B
Nuveen Short Term Municipal Bond A
Price$9.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets426.49M
FAFJX vs FSHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFJX vs. FSHAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFJX is a Hold and FSHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFJX has more cash in the bank: 4.66B vs. FSHAX (426M). FSHAX pays higher dividends than FAFJX: FSHAX (2.94) vs FAFJX (1.89). FAFJX was incepted earlier than FSHAX: FAFJX (12 years) vs FSHAX (23 years). FAFJX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FSHAX (0.71). FSHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FAFJX (27.00). FAFJX (2500) and FSHAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. FAFJX (0.27). FSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.05 vs. FAFJX (2.27).
| FAFJX | FSHAX | FAFJX / FSHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.63 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.71 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.520 | 2.845 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.66B | 426M | 1,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 2.94 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | 3.11 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.52 | 9.14 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.27 | 6.05 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.90 | 13.45 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers