Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFJX vs FSHAX
FAFJX vs FSHAX Comparison
Open Charts FAFJX vs FSHAX
Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond C
Price$10.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.64B
Nuveen Short Term Municipal Bond A
Price$9.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets423.44M
FAFJX vs FSHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFJX vs. FSHAX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFJX is a Hold and FSHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFJX has more cash in the bank: 4.64B vs. FSHAX (423M). FSHAX pays higher dividends than FAFJX: FSHAX (2.91) vs FAFJX (1.86). FAFJX was incepted earlier than FSHAX: FAFJX (11 years) vs FSHAX (23 years). FAFJX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FSHAX (0.70). FSHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FAFJX (27.00). FAFJX (3000) and FSHAX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.48 vs. FAFJX (1.22). FSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.56 vs. FAFJX (1.30).
| FAFJX | FSHAX | FAFJX / FSHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.66 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.70 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.442 | 1.818 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.64B | 423M | 1,097% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.91 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | 3.48 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.25 | 7.57 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.30 | 5.56 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.67 | 12.59 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers