Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFJX vs FSHAX
FAFJX vs FSHAX Comparison
Open Charts FAFJX vs FSHAX
Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond C
Price$10.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.62B
Nuveen Short Term Municipal Bond A
Price$9.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets417M
FAFJX vs FSHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFJX vs. FSHAX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFJX is a Hold and FSHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFJX has more cash in the bank: 4.62B vs. FSHAX (417M). FSHAX pays higher dividends than FAFJX: FSHAX (2.86) vs FAFJX (1.84). FAFJX was incepted earlier than FSHAX: FAFJX (11 years) vs FSHAX (23 years). FAFJX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FSHAX (0.70). FSHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FAFJX (22.00). FAFJX (3000) and FSHAX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.32 vs. FAFJX (0.99). FSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.41 vs. FAFJX (1.23).
| FAFJX | FSHAX | FAFJX / FSHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.66 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.70 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.370 | 0.900 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.62B | 417M | 1,109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 2.86 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.99 | 3.32 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.55 | 7.30 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.23 | 5.41 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.64 | 11.77 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement