Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFJX vs WSSCX
FAFJX vs WSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FAFJX vs WSSCX
Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond C
Price$10.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.66B
Allspring Short-Term Municipal Bd C
Price$9.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
FAFJX vs WSSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFJX vs. WSSCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFJX is a Hold and WSSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFJX has more cash in the bank: 4.66B vs. WSSCX (1.59B). FAFJX pays higher dividends than WSSCX: FAFJX (1.89) vs WSSCX (1.66). FAFJX was incepted earlier than WSSCX: FAFJX (12 years) vs WSSCX (23 years). WSSCX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FAFJX (1.43). FAFJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. WSSCX (24.00). WSSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAFJX: WSSCX (1000) vs FAFJX (2500). WSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.42 vs. FAFJX (0.17). WSSCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.98 vs. FAFJX (1.99).
| FAFJX | WSSCX | FAFJX / WSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.38 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.51 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.239 | 2.367 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.66B | 1.59B | 294% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.66 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.17 | 2.42 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.23 | 7.24 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.99 | 2.98 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.50 | 5.33 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers