Ad is loading...
FAFJX vs WSSCX
FAFJX vs WSSCX Comparison
Open Charts FAFJX vs WSSCX
Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond C
Price$10.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.62B
Allspring Short-Term Municipal Bd C
Price$9.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
FAFJX vs WSSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFJX vs. WSSCX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFJX is a Hold and WSSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAFJX has more cash in the bank: 4.62B vs. WSSCX (1.53B). FAFJX pays higher dividends than WSSCX: FAFJX (1.84) vs WSSCX (1.66). FAFJX was incepted earlier than WSSCX: FAFJX (11 years) vs WSSCX (22 years). WSSCX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FAFJX (1.43). WSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FAFJX (22.00). WSSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAFJX: WSSCX (1000) vs FAFJX (3000). WSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.31 vs. FAFJX (0.35). WSSCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.58 vs. FAFJX (2.05).
| FAFJX | WSSCX | FAFJX / WSSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.38 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.51 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.276 | 0.459 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.62B | 1.53B | 302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.66 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | 2.31 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.94 | 5.61 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.05 | 2.58 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.35 | 3.26 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...