Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFLX vs FQMDX
FAFLX vs FQMDX Comparison
Open Charts FAFLX vs FQMDX
Nuveen LA Municipal Bond C
Price$10.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.89M
Franklin MD Tax Free Income A
Price$9.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.85M
FAFLX vs FQMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFLX vs. FQMDX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFLX is a Hold and FQMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQMDX has more cash in the bank: 319M vs. FAFLX (214M). FQMDX pays higher dividends than FAFLX: FQMDX (3.32) vs FAFLX (2.41). FAFLX was incepted earlier than FQMDX: FAFLX (12 years) vs FQMDX (7 years). FAFLX (1.63) is less costly to investors than FQMDX (0.90). FAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FQMDX (8.30). FQMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAFLX: FQMDX (1000) vs FAFLX (2500). FQMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.41 vs. FAFLX (-0.48). FAFLX return over 5 years is better than : 2.09 vs. FQMDX (-1.71).
| FAFLX | FQMDX | FAFLX / FQMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.90 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.90 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.143 | 1.197 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214M | 319M | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 3.32 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.48 | 0.41 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.26 | 9.83 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.09 | -1.71 | -122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers