Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFLX vs MSNCX
FAFLX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FAFLX vs MSNCX
Nuveen LA Municipal Bond C
Price$10.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.89M
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.73
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets511.12M
FAFLX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFLX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFLX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 511M vs. FAFLX (214M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FAFLX: MSNCX (3.33) vs FAFLX (2.41). FAFLX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FAFLX (12 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). FAFLX (1.63) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). FAFLX (20.00) and MSNCX (20.00) have comparable annual turnover. MSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAFLX: MSNCX (1000) vs FAFLX (2500). MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.50 vs. FAFLX (-0.48). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. FAFLX (2.09).
| FAFLX | MSNCX | FAFLX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.84 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.86 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.143 | 1.560 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214M | 511M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 3.33 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.48 | 0.50 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.26 | 11.54 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.09 | 3.55 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.05 | 15.91 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers