Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAFSX vs RPFGX
FAFSX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FAFSX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Advisor Financials M
Price$37.84
Change-$0.08 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets705.69M
FAFSX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAFSX vs. RPFGX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAFSX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. FAFSX (706M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than FAFSX: RPFGX (1.29) vs FAFSX (0.91). FAFSX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FAFSX (29 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FAFSX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAFSX (4%) vs FAFSX (4%). FAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FAFSX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.79 vs. FAFSX (15.80). FAFSX (116.03) and RPFGX (110.82) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAFSX | RPFGX | FAFSX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.94 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.722 | 19.123 | 51% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 706M | 1.17B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.29 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.80 | 23.79 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.15 | 83.01 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.03 | 110.82 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.97 | 113.34 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement