Ad is loading...
FAGKX vs VMGIX
FAGKX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts FAGKX vs VMGIX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K
Price$68.21
Change-$0.03 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.36B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$100.78
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.44B
FAGKX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGKX vs. VMGIX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGKX is a Buy and VMGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. FAGKX (3.36B). VMGIX pays higher dividends than FAGKX: VMGIX (0.58) vs FAGKX (0.00). FAGKX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: FAGKX (17 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). FAGKX (0.68) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). FAGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. VMGIX (21.00). FAGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGIX: FAGKX (0) vs VMGIX (3000). VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.54 vs. FAGKX (7.35). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 69.51 vs. FAGKX (39.12).
| FAGKX | VMGIX | FAGKX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.19 | 358% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.19 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.337 | 0.975 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.36B | 27.4B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.35 | 11.54 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.02 | 41.75 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | 69.51 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.03 | 140.66 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers