Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs FIKAX
FAGNX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. FIKAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and FIKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX (895M) and FIKAX (895M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FIKAX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: FIKAX (0.97) vs FAGNX (0.75). FAGNX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: FAGNX (38 years) vs FIKAX (7 years). FAGNX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). FAGNX (15.00) and FIKAX (15.00) have comparable annual turnover. FAGNX (0) and FIKAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. FAGNX (4.72). FIKAX (227.59) and FAGNX (216.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAGNX | FIKAX | FAGNX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.58 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.58 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.360 | 13.028 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 895M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.97 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | 5.42 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.91 | 14.13 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 216.91 | 227.59 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.37 | N/A | - |