Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs FSTEX
FAGNX vs FSTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. FSTEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and FSTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 944M vs. FSTEX (407M). FSTEX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: FSTEX (3.69) vs FAGNX (0.74). FAGNX was incepted earlier than FSTEX: FAGNX (38 years) vs FSTEX (42 years). FAGNX (1.23) and FSTEX (1.23) have similar cost to investors . FSTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FAGNX (15.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTEX: FAGNX (0) vs FSTEX (1000). FSTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.42 vs. FAGNX (0.29). FAGNX (248.96) and FSTEX (240.67) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAGNX | FSTEX | FAGNX / FSTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.23 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.23 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.562 | 5.841 | 78% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 944M | 407M | 232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 3.69 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 2.42 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.90 | 19.70 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 248.96 | 240.67 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.71 | 27.16 | 231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement