Ad is loading...
FAGNX vs HNRGX
FAGNX vs HNRGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. HNRGX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Buy and HNRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 892M vs. HNRGX (14.1M). FAGNX pays higher dividends than HNRGX: FAGNX (0.88) vs HNRGX (0.08). FAGNX was incepted earlier than HNRGX: FAGNX (37 years) vs HNRGX (11 years). HNRGX (2.61) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). FAGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HNRGX (14.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNRGX: FAGNX (0) vs HNRGX (2500). HNRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.13 vs. FAGNX (-15.88). HNRGX return over 5 years is better than : 220.87 vs. FAGNX (160.10).
| FAGNX | HNRGX | FAGNX / HNRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 2.44 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 2.61 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.307 | -5.165 | 141% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 892M | 14.1M | 6,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.08 | 1,062% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.88 | -5.13 | 310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.73 | 24.83 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 160.10 | 220.87 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.82 | 36.61 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers