Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs HNRGX
FAGNX vs HNRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. HNRGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and HNRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. HNRGX (13.2M). FAGNX pays higher dividends than HNRGX: FAGNX (0.75) vs HNRGX (0.07). FAGNX was incepted earlier than HNRGX: FAGNX (38 years) vs HNRGX (12 years). HNRGX (2.61) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). FAGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. HNRGX (14.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNRGX: FAGNX (0) vs HNRGX (2500). HNRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. FAGNX (4.53). HNRGX (222.62) and FAGNX (215.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAGNX | HNRGX | FAGNX / HNRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 2.44 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 2.61 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.360 | 11.669 | 106% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 13.2M | 6,780% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.07 | 1,051% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.53 | 6.46 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.91 | 23.15 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 215.11 | 222.62 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.37 | 110.69 | 72% |