Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs ICPAX
FAGNX vs ICPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICPAX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Buy and ICPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 931M vs. ICPAX (133M). ICPAX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: ICPAX (0.87) vs FAGNX (0.80). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICPAX: FAGNX (38 years) vs ICPAX (26 years). ICPAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). ICPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FAGNX (31.00). ICPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAGNX (4%) vs FAGNX (4%). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICPAX: FAGNX (0) vs ICPAX (1000). ICPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.24 vs. FAGNX (-5.36). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 186.88 vs. ICPAX (158.62).
| FAGNX | ICPAX | FAGNX / ICPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.50 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.60 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.167 | 9.969 | 32% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 70% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 931M | 133M | 700% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.87 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.36 | 14.24 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.02 | 32.05 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 186.88 | 158.62 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.99 | 34.70 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement