Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs ICPAX
FAGNX vs ICPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICPAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Buy and ICPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 897M vs. ICPAX (131M). ICPAX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: ICPAX (0.97) vs FAGNX (0.84). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICPAX: FAGNX (37 years) vs ICPAX (26 years). ICPAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). ICPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FAGNX (31.00). ICPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAGNX (4%) vs FAGNX (4%). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICPAX: FAGNX (0) vs ICPAX (1000). ICPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. FAGNX (-0.06). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 178.59 vs. ICPAX (155.94).
| FAGNX | ICPAX | FAGNX / ICPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.50 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.60 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.853 | 8.187 | 47% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 70% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 897M | 131M | 685% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.97 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.06 | 17.07 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.99 | 28.67 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 178.59 | 155.94 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.76 | 18.69 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement