Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs ICPAX
FAGNX vs ICPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICPAX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and ICPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 944M vs. ICPAX (147M). FAGNX pays higher dividends than ICPAX: FAGNX (0.74) vs ICPAX (0.59). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICPAX: FAGNX (38 years) vs ICPAX (27 years). ICPAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). ICPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FAGNX (31.00). ICPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAGNX (4%) vs FAGNX (4%). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICPAX: FAGNX (0) vs ICPAX (1000). ICPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.17 vs. FAGNX (2.40). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 256.65 vs. ICPAX (200.65).
| FAGNX | ICPAX | FAGNX / ICPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.50 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.60 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.747 | 17.933 | 49% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 70% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 944M | 147M | 642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.59 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.40 | 20.17 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.97 | 45.17 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 256.65 | 200.65 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.85 | 46.66 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement