Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs ICPAX
FAGNX vs ICPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICPAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and ICPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 892M vs. ICPAX (125M). ICPAX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: ICPAX (1.05) vs FAGNX (0.88). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICPAX: FAGNX (37 years) vs ICPAX (26 years). ICPAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). ICPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FAGNX (31.00). ICPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAGNX (4%) vs FAGNX (4%). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICPAX: FAGNX (0) vs ICPAX (1000). ICPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. FAGNX (-12.13). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 168.31 vs. ICPAX (153.26).
| FAGNX | ICPAX | FAGNX / ICPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.50 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.60 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.274 | 2.224 | -192% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 70% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 892M | 125M | 714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.05 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.13 | 10.02 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.39 | 21.11 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 168.31 | 153.26 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.53 | 8.85 | 311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers