Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs ICWIX
FAGNX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICWIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Buy and ICWIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 897M vs. ICWIX (126M). ICWIX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: ICWIX (1.47) vs FAGNX (0.84). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FAGNX (37 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). FAGNX (1.23) is less costly to investors than ICWIX (1.10). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FAGNX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.03 vs. FAGNX (-9.15). ICWIX (132.72) and FAGNX (131.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAGNX | ICWIX | FAGNX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.00 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.10 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.764 | 5.996 | -63% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 897M | 126M | 712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.47 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.15 | 15.03 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.21 | 12.63 | -41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 131.71 | 132.72 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers