Ad is loading...
FAGNX vs ICWIX
FAGNX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICWIX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Buy and ICWIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. ICWIX (135M). ICWIX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: ICWIX (1.63) vs FAGNX (1.49). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FAGNX (37 years) vs ICWIX (8 years). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.75 vs. FAGNX (21.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FAGNX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.67 vs. FAGNX (18.02). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 92.61 vs. ICWIX (71.46).
| FAGNX | ICWIX | FAGNX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.636 | 10.481 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 135M | 832% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.63 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.02 | 39.67 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.41 | 56.03 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.61 | 71.46 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...