Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs ICWIX
FAGNX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICWIX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. ICWIX (133M). ICWIX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: ICWIX (1.32) vs FAGNX (0.77). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FAGNX (38 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). FAGNX (1.23) is less costly to investors than ICWIX (1.10). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FAGNX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.31 vs. FAGNX (-0.48). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 183.06 vs. ICWIX (155.84).
| FAGNX | ICWIX | FAGNX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.00 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.10 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.506 | 9.311 | 16% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 133M | 708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.32 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.48 | 20.31 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.99 | 37.92 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 183.06 | 155.84 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers