Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs ICWIX
FAGNX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICWIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. ICWIX (149M). ICWIX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: ICWIX (1.05) vs FAGNX (0.75). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FAGNX (38 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). FAGNX (1.23) is less costly to investors than ICWIX (1.10). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.34 vs. FAGNX (15.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FAGNX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.09 vs. FAGNX (4.72). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 216.91 vs. ICWIX (175.88).
| FAGNX | ICWIX | FAGNX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.00 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.10 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.360 | 20.473 | 60% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 149M | 601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.05 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | 15.09 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.91 | 31.91 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 216.91 | 175.88 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.37 | N/A | - |