Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs ICWIX
FAGNX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICWIX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 897M vs. ICWIX (130M). ICWIX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: ICWIX (1.47) vs FAGNX (0.84). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FAGNX (38 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). FAGNX (1.23) is less costly to investors than ICWIX (1.10). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FAGNX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.49 vs. FAGNX (-5.92). FAGNX (191.68) and ICWIX (182.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAGNX | ICWIX | FAGNX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.00 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.10 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.399 | 8.619 | 5% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 897M | 130M | 690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.47 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.92 | 16.49 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.31 | 41.09 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 191.68 | 182.35 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement