Ad is loading...
FAGNX vs ICWIX
FAGNX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICWIX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. ICWIX (114M). ICWIX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: ICWIX (1.49) vs FAGNX (0.77). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FAGNX (37 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). FAGNX (1.23) is less costly to investors than ICWIX (1.10). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FAGNX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.28 vs. FAGNX (-19.99). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 195.83 vs. ICWIX (146.08).
| FAGNX | ICWIX | FAGNX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.00 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.10 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.462 | -11.411 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 114M | 943% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.49 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.99 | -7.28 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.72 | 9.07 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 195.83 | 146.08 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers