Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs ICWIX
FAGNX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. ICWIX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 931M vs. ICWIX (131M). ICWIX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: ICWIX (1.36) vs FAGNX (0.80). FAGNX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FAGNX (38 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). FAGNX (1.23) is less costly to investors than ICWIX (1.10). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FAGNX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.19 vs. FAGNX (-6.02). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 194.16 vs. ICWIX (167.35).
| FAGNX | ICWIX | FAGNX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.00 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.10 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.100 | 7.062 | 44% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 931M | 131M | 711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.36 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.02 | 10.19 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.22 | 52.05 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 194.16 | 167.35 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement