Ad is loading...
FAGNX vs IEFCX
FAGNX vs IEFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. IEFCX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Buy and IEFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 892M vs. IEFCX (412M). IEFCX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: IEFCX (4.74) vs FAGNX (0.88). FAGNX was incepted earlier than IEFCX: FAGNX (37 years) vs IEFCX (25 years). IEFCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). FAGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. IEFCX (28.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than IEFCX: FAGNX (0) vs IEFCX (1000). IEFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.85 vs. FAGNX (-10.85). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 195.52 vs. IEFCX (181.71).
| FAGNX | IEFCX | FAGNX / IEFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 2.02 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 2.02 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.749 | 0.469 | -373% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 892M | 412M | 217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 4.74 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.85 | -4.85 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.24 | 14.11 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 195.52 | 181.71 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.00 | -8.21 | -377% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...