Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs IEFCX
FAGNX vs IEFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. IEFCX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and IEFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. IEFCX (433M). IEFCX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: IEFCX (4.15) vs FAGNX (0.75). FAGNX was incepted earlier than IEFCX: FAGNX (38 years) vs IEFCX (26 years). IEFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). IEFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FAGNX (15.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than IEFCX: FAGNX (0) vs IEFCX (1000). IEFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.84 vs. FAGNX (4.53). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 215.11 vs. IEFCX (194.04).
| FAGNX | IEFCX | FAGNX / IEFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.98 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.98 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.360 | 13.012 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 433M | 207% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 4.15 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.53 | 4.84 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.91 | 13.79 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 215.11 | 194.04 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.37 | 32.63 | 243% |