Ad is loading...
FAGNX vs RYENX
FAGNX vs RYENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. RYENX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and RYENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. RYENX (17M). RYENX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: RYENX (4.14) vs FAGNX (0.77). FAGNX was incepted earlier than RYENX: FAGNX (37 years) vs RYENX (21 years). RYENX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). RYENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 500.00 vs. FAGNX (31.00). RYENX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAGNX (4%) vs FAGNX (4%). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYENX: FAGNX (0) vs RYENX (2500). FAGNX (-24.85) and RYENX (-25.61) have marching annual gain over last year. FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 176.29 vs. RYENX (144.58).
| FAGNX | RYENX | FAGNX / RYENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.65 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.68 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.574 | -16.050 | 85% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 17M | 6,324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 4.14 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.85 | -25.61 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.45 | -6.58 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 176.29 | 144.58 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.03 | -21.78 | -64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...