Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAGNX vs RYENX
FAGNX vs RYENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAGNX vs. RYENX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAGNX is a Hold and RYENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. RYENX (15.9M). RYENX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: RYENX (3.98) vs FAGNX (0.75). FAGNX was incepted earlier than RYENX: FAGNX (38 years) vs RYENX (21 years). RYENX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). RYENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 534.00 vs. FAGNX (15.00). RYENX initial investment is less costly to investors than FAGNX (4%) vs FAGNX (4%). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYENX: FAGNX (0) vs RYENX (2500). FAGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.53 vs. RYENX (-0.02). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 215.11 vs. RYENX (166.68).
| FAGNX | RYENX | FAGNX / RYENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.64 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.69 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.360 | 7.386 | 167% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 15.9M | 5,629% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 3.98 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.53 | -0.02 | -19,471% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.91 | 2.51 | 475% |
| Returns for 5 years | 215.11 | 166.68 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.37 | 33.98 | 234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement