Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAKDX vs RMEBX
FAKDX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FAKDX vs RMEBX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Investor
Price$9.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.07M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.45
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
FAKDX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAKDX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAKDX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FAKDX (84.1M). FAKDX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FAKDX (1.78) vs RMEBX (1.05). FAKDX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FAKDX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). FAKDX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FAKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAKDX: RMEBX (250) vs FAKDX (500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.78 vs. FAKDX (-19.66). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.31 vs. FAKDX (18.18).
| FAKDX | RMEBX | FAKDX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.07 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.07 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.837 | 14.628 | -101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.1M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.05 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.66 | 7.78 | -253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.09 | 37.96 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.18 | 62.31 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.40 | 95.56 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement