Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAKDX vs RMFEX
FAKDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FAKDX vs RMFEX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Investor
Price$12.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.69M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
FAKDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAKDX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAKDX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FAKDX (96.7M). FAKDX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FAKDX (1.85) vs RMFEX (1.53). FAKDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FAKDX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FAKDX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FAKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAKDX: RMFEX (250) vs FAKDX (500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. FAKDX (4.16). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.33 vs. FAKDX (52.34).
| FAKDX | RMFEX | FAKDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.036 | 9.748 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.7M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 1.53 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | 11.81 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.68 | 30.45 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.34 | 64.33 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.23 | 86.20 | 47% |