Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAKDX vs RMFEX
FAKDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FAKDX vs RMFEX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Investor
Price$9.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.07M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.48
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
FAKDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAKDX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAKDX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FAKDX (84.1M). FAKDX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FAKDX (1.78) vs RMFEX (1.46). FAKDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FAKDX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FAKDX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FAKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAKDX: RMFEX (250) vs FAKDX (500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.26 vs. FAKDX (-19.66). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.04 vs. FAKDX (18.18).
| FAKDX | RMFEX | FAKDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.837 | 15.028 | -99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.1M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.46 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.66 | 8.26 | -238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.09 | 39.84 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.18 | 66.04 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.40 | 105.33 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement