Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAKDX vs RMFEX
FAKDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FAKDX vs RMFEX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Investor
Price$12.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.27M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.59
Change-$0.20 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.3B
FAKDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAKDX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAKDX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FAKDX (90.3M). FAKDX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FAKDX (1.76) vs RMFEX (1.49). FAKDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FAKDX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FAKDX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FAKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAKDX: RMFEX (250) vs FAKDX (500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. FAKDX (6.55). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.71 vs. FAKDX (48.09).
| FAKDX | RMFEX | FAKDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.059 | 12.995 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.3M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.49 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | 8.31 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.80 | 34.09 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.09 | 62.71 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.79 | 101.12 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement