FALC
Price
$1.78
Change
-$0.02 (-1.11%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
12.72M
WRDLY
Price
$1.45
Change
-$0.05 (-3.33%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
872.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FALC vs WRDLY

Header iconFALC vs WRDLY Comparison
Open Charts FALC vs WRDLYBanner chart's image
FalconStor Software
Price$1.78
Change-$0.02 (-1.11%)
Volume$205
Capitalization12.72M
Worldline SA
Price$1.45
Change-$0.05 (-3.33%)
Volume$4.8K
Capitalization872.9M
FALC vs WRDLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FALC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRDLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FALC vs. WRDLY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALC is a Hold and WRDLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FALC: $1.78 vs. WRDLY: $1.45)
Brand notoriety: FALC and WRDLY are both not notable
FALC represents the Packaged Software, while WRDLY is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FALC: 19% vs. WRDLY: 86%
Market capitalization -- FALC: $12.72M vs. WRDLY: $872.9M
FALC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $12.72M. WRDLY’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $872.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.68B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.77T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FALC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRDLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FALC is a better buy in the long-term than WRDLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FALC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRDLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FALC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WRDLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WRDLY is a better buy in the short-term than FALC.

Price Growth

FALC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.11% price change this week, while WRDLY (@Computer Communications) price change was -6.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.13%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.11% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.04% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRDLY($873M) has a higher market cap than FALC($12.7M). FALC YTD gains are higher at: -11.000 vs. WRDLY (-65.882). FALC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.84M vs. WRDLY (-3.79B). WRDLY has more cash in the bank: 1.85B vs. FALC (2.86M). FALC has less debt than WRDLY: FALC (2.33M) vs WRDLY (4.34B). WRDLY has higher revenues than FALC: WRDLY (4.55B) vs FALC (11.2M).
FALCWRDLYFALC / WRDLY
Capitalization12.7M873M1%
EBITDA1.84M-3.79B-0%
Gain YTD-11.000-65.88217%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue11.2M4.55B0%
Total Cash2.86M1.85B0%
Total Debt2.33M4.34B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FALC vs WRDLY: Fundamental Ratings
FALC
WRDLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2610
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5093
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WRDLY's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (74) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

WRDLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

WRDLY's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

FALC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (93) in the null industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.

FALC's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRDLY (99) in the null industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FALCWRDLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FALC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRDLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRC45.380.17
+0.38%
Gorman-Rupp Company (The)
RDNT75.12-0.42
-0.56%
RadNet
BBVA18.79-0.49
-2.54%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
ELVA6.60-0.84
-11.29%
Electrovaya
MYO0.91-0.13
-12.50%
Myomo

FALC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FALC
1D Price
Change %
FALC100%
N/A
WRDLY - FALC
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
WWLNF - FALC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CXM - FALC
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
CREX - FALC
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.48%
AI - FALC
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.74%
More

WRDLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRDLY has been loosely correlated with FALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRDLY jumps, then FALC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRDLY
1D Price
Change %
WRDLY100%
-3.33%
FALC - WRDLY
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NEXXY - WRDLY
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ADYEY - WRDLY
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
SDGR - WRDLY
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
UPBD - WRDLY
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
More