FALC
Price
$1.79
Change
+$0.42 (+30.66%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
WWLNF
Price
$9.00
Change
+$1.00 (+12.50%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

FALC vs WWLNF

Header iconFALC vs WWLNF Comparison
Open Charts FALC vs WWLNFBanner chart's image
FalconStor Software
Price$1.79
Change+$0.42 (+30.66%)
Volume$7.94K
CapitalizationN/A
Worldline SA
Price$9.00
Change+$1.00 (+12.50%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
FALC vs WWLNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FALC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWLNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FALC vs. WWLNF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALC is a Sell and WWLNF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FALC: $1.37 vs. WWLNF: $9.00)
Brand notoriety: FALC and WWLNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FALC: 46% vs. WWLNF: 22%
Market capitalization -- FALC: $9.61M vs. WWLNF: $11.22B
FALC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $9.61M. WWLNF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $11.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FALC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWWLNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WWLNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WWLNF is a better buy in the long-term than FALC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FALC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWLNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FALC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WWLNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WWLNF is a better buy in the short-term than FALC.

Price Growth

FALC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while WWLNF (@Packaged Software) price change was +12.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FALC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWLNF($11.2B) has a higher market cap than FALC($9.62M). FALC YTD gains are higher at: 2.239 vs. WWLNF (-47.887). WWLNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 907M vs. FALC (-382.26K). WWLNF has more cash in the bank: 1.42B vs. FALC (1.84M). FALC has less debt than WWLNF: FALC (2.28M) vs WWLNF (3.58B). WWLNF has higher revenues than FALC: WWLNF (4.59B) vs FALC (10.3M).
FALCWWLNFFALC / WWLNF
Capitalization9.62M11.2B0%
EBITDA-382.26K907M-0%
Gain YTD2.239-47.887-5%
P/E RatioN/A42.02-
Revenue10.3M4.59B0%
Total Cash1.84M1.42B0%
Total Debt2.28M3.58B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FALC vs WWLNF: Fundamental Ratings
FALC
WWLNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2936
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6780
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WWLNF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (78) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WWLNF’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

WWLNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WWLNF’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

WWLNF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WWLNF’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

WWLNF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FALC (63) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that WWLNF’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

FALC's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as WWLNF (80) in the null industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew similarly to WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FALCWWLNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FALC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWLNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JOEAX11.66N/A
N/A
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opps Investor
GSDPX49.16N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq P
NEXTX31.93-0.29
-0.90%
Shelton Sustainable Equity Investor
VEXMX151.65-1.77
-1.15%
Vanguard Extended Market Index Investor
SPWYX16.23-0.20
-1.22%
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr Y

FALC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FALC
1D Price
Change %
FALC100%
N/A
WRDLY - FALC
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
WWLNF - FALC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CXM - FALC
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
CREX - FALC
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
AI - FALC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

WWLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWLNF has been loosely correlated with NEXXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWLNF jumps, then NEXXY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWLNF
1D Price
Change %
WWLNF100%
N/A
NEXXY - WWLNF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FALC - WWLNF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DYNDF - WWLNF
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.98%
ITMSF - WWLNF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
AFRM - WWLNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
More