Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FALZX vs FOFRX
FALZX vs FOFRX Comparison
Open Charts FALZX vs FOFRX
Franklin Alabama Tax Free Income Advisor
Price$9.81
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets167M
Franklin OR Tax Free Income R6
Price$10.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets787.7M
FALZX vs FOFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FALZX vs. FOFRX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALZX is a Hold and FOFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFRX has more cash in the bank: 788M vs. FALZX (167M). FOFRX pays higher dividends than FALZX: FOFRX (3.61) vs FALZX (3.07). FALZX was incepted earlier than FOFRX: FALZX (9 years) vs FOFRX (8 years). FALZX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FOFRX (0.53). FALZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.27 vs. FOFRX (11.31). FALZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOFRX: FALZX (0) vs FOFRX (1000000). FOFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.30 vs. FALZX (-1.67). FALZX return over 5 years is better than : -4.15 vs. FOFRX (-4.68).
| FALZX | FOFRX | FALZX / FOFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.53 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.53 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.430 | -1.267 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167M | 788M | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.61 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -1.30 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.18 | 5.61 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.15 | -4.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement