Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FALZX vs MDXBX
FALZX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FALZX vs MDXBX
Franklin Alabama Tax Free Income Advisor
Price$9.79
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.77M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.73
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
FALZX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FALZX vs. MDXBX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALZX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. FALZX (169M). MDXBX pays higher dividends than FALZX: MDXBX (3.51) vs FALZX (3.07). FALZX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FALZX (9 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FALZX (0.70) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FALZX (14.27). FALZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: FALZX (0) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.32 vs. FALZX (-1.99). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.90 vs. FALZX (-5.30).
| FALZX | MDXBX | FALZX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.53 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.009 | -1.904 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 2.28B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.51 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.99 | -1.32 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.38 | 3.97 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.30 | 0.90 | -590% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement