Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FALZX vs TFBIX
FALZX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts FALZX vs TFBIX
Franklin Alabama Tax Free Income Advisor
Price$9.76
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.2M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
FALZX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FALZX vs. TFBIX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALZX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.26B vs. FALZX (168M). TFBIX pays higher dividends than FALZX: TFBIX (3.58) vs FALZX (3.07). FALZX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: FALZX (9 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). FALZX (0.70) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). TFBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FALZX (14.27). FALZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: FALZX (0) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.26 vs. FALZX (-2.17). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.95 vs. FALZX (-5.75).
| FALZX | TFBIX | FALZX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.41 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.41 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.475 | -2.068 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 168M | 2.26B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.58 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.17 | -1.26 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.09 | 4.19 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.75 | 0.95 | -605% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |