Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FALZX vs TFBIX
FALZX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts FALZX vs TFBIX
Franklin Alabama Tax Free Income Advisor
Price$9.79
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.73M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FALZX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FALZX vs. TFBIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALZX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FALZX (170M). TFBIX pays higher dividends than FALZX: TFBIX (3.52) vs FALZX (3.01). FALZX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: FALZX (9 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). FALZX (0.68) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). TFBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FALZX (14.27). FALZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: FALZX (0) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.28 vs. FALZX (-0.39). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.32 vs. FALZX (-4.20).
| FALZX | TFBIX | FALZX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.41 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.41 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.921 | -2.049 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 2.27B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 3.52 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.39 | 0.28 | -138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.86 | 5.21 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.20 | 3.32 | -127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers