Ad is loading...
FALZX vs TFBIX
FALZX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts FALZX vs TFBIX
Franklin Alabama Tax Free Income Advisor
Price$9.77
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets167.63M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.72
Change+$0.05 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FALZX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FALZX vs. TFBIX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALZX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FALZX (168M). TFBIX pays higher dividends than FALZX: TFBIX (3.42) vs FALZX (2.91). FALZX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: FALZX (9 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). FALZX (0.68) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.42). TFBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.70 vs. FALZX (7.51). FALZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: FALZX (0) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.43 vs. FALZX (-0.47). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.37 vs. FALZX (-4.05).
| FALZX | TFBIX | FALZX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.42 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.42 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.343 | -3.255 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 168M | 2.27B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 3.42 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | 0.43 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.68 | 4.40 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.05 | 4.37 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...