Ad is loading...
FALZX vs TFBVX
FALZX vs TFBVX Comparison
Open Charts FALZX vs TFBVX
Franklin Alabama Tax Free Income Advisor
Price$9.77
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets167.63M
T. Rowe Price Virginia Tax Free Bond I
Price$10.74
Change+$0.04 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
FALZX vs TFBVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FALZX vs. TFBVX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALZX is a Hold and TFBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBVX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. FALZX (168M). TFBVX pays higher dividends than FALZX: TFBVX (3.39) vs FALZX (2.91). FALZX was incepted earlier than TFBVX: FALZX (9 years) vs TFBVX (8 years). FALZX (0.68) is less costly to investors than TFBVX (0.43). TFBVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. FALZX (7.51). FALZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBVX: FALZX (0) vs TFBVX (500000). TFBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.24 vs. FALZX (-0.47). TFBVX return over 5 years is better than : 2.62 vs. FALZX (-4.05).
| FALZX | TFBVX | FALZX / TFBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.43 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.43 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.343 | -3.848 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 168M | 1.27B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 3.39 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | -0.24 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.68 | 4.03 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.05 | 2.62 | -155% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...