Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FALZX vs TFBVX
FALZX vs TFBVX Comparison
Open Charts FALZX vs TFBVX
Franklin Alabama Tax Free Income Advisor
Price$9.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.84M
T. Rowe Price Virginia Tax Free Bond I
Price$10.83
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
FALZX vs TFBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FALZX vs. TFBVX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FALZX is a Hold and TFBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBVX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. FALZX (169M). TFBVX pays higher dividends than FALZX: TFBVX (3.50) vs FALZX (3.07). FALZX was incepted earlier than TFBVX: FALZX (9 years) vs TFBVX (8 years). FALZX (0.70) is less costly to investors than TFBVX (0.42). TFBVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.10 vs. FALZX (14.27). FALZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBVX: FALZX (0) vs TFBVX (500000). TFBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.70 vs. FALZX (-0.85). TFBVX return over 5 years is better than : 1.74 vs. FALZX (-3.07).
| FALZX | TFBVX | FALZX / TFBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.42 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.42 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.323 | -0.476 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 1.31B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.50 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | -0.70 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.81 | 9.67 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.07 | 1.74 | -177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement