FANDF
Price
$4.64
Change
+$0.42 (+9.95%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
25.96B
NAUBF
Price
$28.50
Change
+$1.76 (+6.58%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
87.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANDF vs NAUBF

Header iconFANDF vs NAUBF Comparison
Open Charts FANDF vs NAUBFBanner chart's image
Firstrand
Price$4.64
Change+$0.42 (+9.95%)
Volume$1.84K
Capitalization25.96B
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
Price$28.50
Change+$1.76 (+6.58%)
Volume$535
Capitalization87.11B
FANDF vs NAUBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANDF vs. NAUBF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANDF is a Buy and NAUBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FANDF: $4.64 vs. NAUBF: $28.50)
Brand notoriety: FANDF and NAUBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANDF: 236% vs. NAUBF: 122%
Market capitalization -- FANDF: $25.96B vs. NAUBF: $87.11B
FANDF [@Major Banks] is valued at $25.96B. NAUBF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $87.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $861.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNAUBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FANDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NAUBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAUBF is a better buy in the long-term than FANDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAUBF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NAUBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANDF is a better buy in the short-term than NAUBF.

Price Growth

FANDF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NAUBF (@Major Banks) price change was +6.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAUBF($87.1B) has a higher market cap than FANDF($26B). NAUBF has higher P/E ratio than FANDF: NAUBF (19.30) vs FANDF (10.71). NAUBF YTD gains are higher at: 23.805 vs. FANDF (16.000). FANDF has less debt than NAUBF: FANDF (21.6B) vs NAUBF (212B). FANDF has higher revenues than NAUBF: FANDF (143B) vs NAUBF (20.7B).
FANDFNAUBFFANDF / NAUBF
Capitalization26B87.1B30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.00023.80567%
P/E Ratio10.7119.3055%
Revenue143B20.7B691%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt21.6B212B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANDF vs NAUBF: Fundamental Ratings
FANDF
NAUBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4695
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3124
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6537
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NAUBF's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (88). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (31). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

FANDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (4). This means that FANDF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUBF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (49). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUBF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (65). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANDFNAUBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTG.X1.3136790.002798
+0.21%
Bitcoin Gold cryptocurrency
HARD.X0.004358-0.000046
-1.04%
Kava Lend cryptocurrency
GLM.X0.211522-0.013622
-6.05%
Golem cryptocurrency
BAL.X1.065936-0.071811
-6.31%
Balancer cryptocurrency
NEAR.X2.728201-0.296463
-9.80%
NEAR Protocol cryptocurrency

FANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FANDF and NAUBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FANDF and NAUBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANDF
1D Price
Change %
FANDF100%
N/A
NAUBF - FANDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMWAY - FANDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
CICHY - FANDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
HBCYF - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
BNDSY - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NAUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUBF and FANDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUBF and FANDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUBF
1D Price
Change %
NAUBF100%
N/A
FANDF - NAUBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBFJF - NAUBF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
SCBFF - NAUBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
IDCBY - NAUBF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
INGVF - NAUBF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More