FANG
Price
$137.78
Change
+$1.02 (+0.75%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.57B
7 days until earnings call
GFR
Price
$5.04
Change
+$0.04 (+0.80%)
Updated
Apr 28, 02:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
411.56M
Ad is loading...

FANG vs GFR

Header iconFANG vs GFR Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs GFRBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$137.78
Change+$1.02 (+0.75%)
Volume$24.57K
Capitalization35.57B
Greenfire Resources
Price$5.04
Change+$0.04 (+0.80%)
Volume$200
Capitalization411.56M
FANG vs GFR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. GFR commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a StrongBuy and GFR is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $136.76 vs. GFR: $4.99)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. GFR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 54% vs. GFR: 43%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $35.57B vs. GFR: $411.56M
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $35.57B. GFR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $411.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than GFR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GFR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFR is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.64% price change this week, while GFR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -3.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

GFR is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+2.81% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($35.6B) has a higher market cap than GFR($412M). FANG has higher P/E ratio than GFR: FANG (11.50) vs GFR (4.21). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -15.934 vs. GFR (-29.320). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.17B vs. GFR (60.9M). FANG has more cash in the bank: 582M vs. GFR (110M). GFR has less debt than FANG: GFR (390M) vs FANG (6.8B). FANG has higher revenues than GFR: FANG (8.34B) vs GFR (676M).
FANGGFRFANG / GFR
Capitalization35.6B412M8,641%
EBITDA6.17B60.9M10,130%
Gain YTD-15.934-29.32054%
P/E Ratio11.504.21273%
Revenue8.34B676M1,234%
Total Cash582M110M529%
Total Debt6.8B390M1,744%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGGFR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEQMX37.570.10
+0.27%
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets M
EQNBX20.350.01
+0.05%
MFS Equity Income B
TVOCX32.27-0.06
-0.19%
Touchstone Small Cap Value C
POSAX8.49-0.02
-0.24%
Principal Global Real Estate Sec A
RYBHX44.27-0.19
-0.43%
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth H

GFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFR has been loosely correlated with KRP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFR jumps, then KRP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFR
1D Price
Change %
GFR100%
+1.63%
KRP - GFR
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
FANG - GFR
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
DVN - GFR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
OVV - GFR
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
CHRD - GFR
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More