FANG
Price
$140.90
Change
-$1.07 (-0.75%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
35.57B
28 days until earnings call
GFR
Price
$4.56
Change
-$0.08 (-1.72%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
411.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs GFR

Header iconFANG vs GFR Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs GFRBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$140.90
Change-$1.07 (-0.75%)
Volume$1.2M
Capitalization35.57B
Greenfire Resources
Price$4.56
Change-$0.08 (-1.72%)
Volume$36.97K
Capitalization411.56M
FANG vs GFR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. GFR commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Hold and GFR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $140.90 vs. GFR: $4.56)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. GFR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 53% vs. GFR: 50%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $35.57B vs. GFR: $411.56M
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $35.57B. GFR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $411.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than GFR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GFR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the short-term than GFR.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.02% price change this week, while GFR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -0.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

GFR is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.42% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($35.6B) has a higher market cap than GFR($412M). FANG has higher P/E ratio than GFR: FANG (11.50) vs GFR (4.21). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -12.787 vs. GFR (-35.411). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.17B vs. GFR (60.9M). FANG has more cash in the bank: 582M vs. GFR (110M). GFR has less debt than FANG: GFR (390M) vs FANG (6.8B). FANG has higher revenues than GFR: FANG (8.34B) vs GFR (676M).
FANGGFRFANG / GFR
Capitalization35.6B412M8,641%
EBITDA6.17B60.9M10,130%
Gain YTD-12.787-35.41136%
P/E Ratio11.504.21273%
Revenue8.34B676M1,234%
Total Cash582M110M529%
Total Debt6.8B390M1,744%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGGFR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBOX34.230.09
+0.27%
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
SIXD27.540.07
+0.26%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Jun/Dec ETF
BBIB98.58N/A
N/A
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S.TrsBd3-10YrETF
GNR56.12-0.12
-0.21%
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
FISR25.63-0.06
-0.23%
SPDR® SSGA Fixed Inc Sect Rotation ETF

GFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFR has been loosely correlated with KRP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFR jumps, then KRP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFR
1D Price
Change %
GFR100%
-1.72%
KRP - GFR
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
FANG - GFR
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
DVN - GFR
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
OVV - GFR
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
PR - GFR
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
More