FANG
Price
$137.44
Change
-$4.84 (-3.40%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.57B
60 days until earnings call
HUSA
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.01 (-2.08%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs HUSA

Header iconFANG vs HUSA Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs HUSABanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$137.44
Change-$4.84 (-3.40%)
Volume$184.31K
Capitalization35.57B
Houston American Energy
Price$0.47
Change-$0.01 (-2.08%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization15.37M
FANG vs HUSA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. HUSA commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a StrongBuy and HUSA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $137.45 vs. HUSA: $0.48)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. HUSA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 84% vs. HUSA: 121%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $35.57B vs. HUSA: $15.37M
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $35.57B. HUSA’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $15.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUSA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUSA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than HUSA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUSA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HUSA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the short-term than HUSA.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.26% price change this week, while HUSA (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

HUSA is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+1.70% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($35.6B) has a higher market cap than HUSA($15.4M). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -14.922 vs. HUSA (-62.558). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.17B vs. HUSA (-1.28M). FANG has more cash in the bank: 582M vs. HUSA (4.46M). HUSA has less debt than FANG: HUSA (164K) vs FANG (6.8B). FANG has higher revenues than HUSA: FANG (8.34B) vs HUSA (872K).
FANGHUSAFANG / HUSA
Capitalization35.6B15.4M231,169%
EBITDA6.17B-1.28M-483,808%
Gain YTD-14.922-62.55824%
P/E Ratio11.50N/A-
Revenue8.34B872K956,307%
Total Cash582M4.46M13,061%
Total Debt6.8B164K4,146,951%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs HUSA: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
HUSA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
543
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33100
SMR RATING
1..100
5596
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5995
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FANG's Valuation (47) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as HUSA (59). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to HUSA’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUSA (100). This means that FANG’s stock grew significantly faster than HUSA’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's SMR Rating (55) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUSA (96). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUSA’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUSA (95). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUSA’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as HUSA (100). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to HUSA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGHUSA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOBR3.560.18
+5.33%
Sobr Safe Inc
BURL242.924.54
+1.90%
Burlington Stores
BNL16.120.15
+0.94%
Broadstone Net Lease
ALTO0.94-0.03
-3.50%
Alto Ingredients
WULF3.83-0.42
-9.79%
TeraWulf

HUSA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUSA has been loosely correlated with INDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUSA jumps, then INDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUSA
1D Price
Change %
HUSA100%
+0.63%
INDO - HUSA
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
USEG - HUSA
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
GTE - HUSA
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
IMPP - HUSA
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
CNQ - HUSA
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More