FANG
Price
$154.94
Change
+$1.88 (+1.23%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
66 days until earnings call
MGY
Price
$22.89
Change
-$0.25 (-1.08%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
53 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FANG vs MGY

Header iconFANG vs MGY Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs MGYBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$154.94
Change+$1.88 (+1.23%)
Volume$7.84M
CapitalizationN/A
Magnolia Oil & Gas
Price$22.89
Change-$0.25 (-1.08%)
Volume$33.14K
CapitalizationN/A
FANG vs MGY Comparison Chart
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. MGY commentary
Dec 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Hold and MGY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 22, 2024
Stock price -- (FANG: $154.94 vs. MGY: $22.89)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. MGY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 354% vs. MGY: 413%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $35.57B vs. MGY: $4.73B
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $35.57B. MGY’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $4.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGY is a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGY is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -5.14% price change this week, while MGY (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -9.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +45.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

MGY is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+45.78% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($35.6B) has a higher market cap than MGY($4.73B). MGY has higher P/E ratio than FANG: MGY (12.84) vs FANG (11.50). MGY YTD gains are higher at: 9.849 vs. FANG (4.359). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.17B vs. MGY (875M). FANG has more cash in the bank: 582M vs. MGY (401M). MGY has less debt than FANG: MGY (393M) vs FANG (6.8B). FANG has higher revenues than MGY: FANG (8.34B) vs MGY (1.23B).
FANGMGYFANG / MGY
Capitalization35.6B4.73B752%
EBITDA6.17B875M705%
Gain YTD4.3599.84944%
P/E Ratio11.5012.8490%
Revenue8.34B1.23B680%
Total Cash582M401M145%
Total Debt6.8B393M1,731%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs MGY: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
MGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7252
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2127
SMR RATING
1..100
6244
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4916
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FANG's Valuation (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (46). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MGY’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (27). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MGY’s over the last 12 months.

MGY's SMR Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (62). This means that MGY’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

MGY's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (63). This means that MGY’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

MGY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANG (49). This means that MGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGMGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBIL35.510.48
+1.38%
WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF
FLCA36.340.32
+0.89%
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
PFXF17.710.13
+0.74%
VanEck Pref Secs ex Fincls ETF
QLV65.690.40
+0.62%
FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF
AVNV54.990.13
+0.23%
Avantis All International Mkts Val ETF

MGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGY has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGY jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGY
1D Price
Change %
MGY100%
-1.08%
MTDR - MGY
87%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
NOG - MGY
86%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
MUR - MGY
84%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
CHRD - MGY
84%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
OVV - MGY
83%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
More