FANG
Price
$140.22
Change
-$0.55 (-0.39%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
40.59B
86 days until earnings call
MWCAF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.03 (+17.65%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
3.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs MWCAF

Header iconFANG vs MWCAF Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs MWCAFBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$140.22
Change-$0.55 (-0.39%)
Volume$1.89M
Capitalization40.59B
Matachewan Consolidated Mines
Price$0.20
Change+$0.03 (+17.65%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization3.3M
FANG vs MWCAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MWCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. MWCAF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Hold and MWCAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $140.22 vs. MWCAF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. MWCAF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 77% vs. MWCAF: 110%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $40.59B vs. MWCAF: $3.3M
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $40.59B. MWCAF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $3.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $119.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMWCAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MWCAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MWCAF is a better buy in the long-term than FANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MWCAF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MWCAF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MWCAF is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while MWCAF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +17.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.15% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($40.6B) has a higher market cap than MWCAF($3.3M). FANG has higher P/E ratio than MWCAF: FANG (10.16) vs MWCAF (1.72). MWCAF YTD gains are higher at: 17.647 vs. FANG (-12.583). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.71B vs. MWCAF (-350.59K). MWCAF has less debt than FANG: MWCAF (10.2K) vs FANG (13.9B). FANG has higher revenues than MWCAF: FANG (14B) vs MWCAF (32.3K).
FANGMWCAFFANG / MWCAF
Capitalization40.6B3.3M1,229,186%
EBITDA9.71B-350.59K-2,770,227%
Gain YTD-12.58317.647-71%
P/E Ratio10.161.72591%
Revenue14B32.3K43,343,653%
Total CashN/A8.33M-
Total Debt13.9B10.2K136,274,510%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs MWCAF: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
MWCAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6439
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3659
SMR RATING
1..100
9136
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5136
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MWCAF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as FANG (63) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that MWCAF’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MWCAF (59) in the null industry. This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to MWCAF’s over the last 12 months.

MWCAF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANG (91) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that MWCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

MWCAF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FANG (60) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that MWCAF’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

MWCAF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FANG (51) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that MWCAF’s stock grew similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGMWCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MWCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LALT21.790.02
+0.08%
First Trust Multi-Strat Alt ETF
NEAR51.040.01
+0.02%
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
VEGN56.75-0.02
-0.04%
US Vegan Climate ETF
SCEC25.17-0.03
-0.14%
Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF
ISD14.41-0.05
-0.35%
PGIM High Yield

MWCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MWCAF and FANG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MWCAF and FANG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MWCAF
1D Price
Change %
MWCAF100%
N/A
FANG - MWCAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
RHCCF - MWCAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TTGXF - MWCAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EERGF - MWCAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEGEF - MWCAF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
More