Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAPIX vs MLLBX
FAPIX vs MLLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAPIX vs. MLLBX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAPIX is a Hold and MLLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. MLLBX (545M). FAPIX pays higher dividends than MLLBX: FAPIX (3.20) vs MLLBX (2.72). FAPIX was incepted earlier than MLLBX: FAPIX (5 years) vs MLLBX (20 years). MLLBX (1.63) is less costly to investors than FAPIX (0.05). FAPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. MLLBX (5.00). MLLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAPIX: MLLBX (1000) vs FAPIX (2000000000). FAPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. MLLBX (3.44). FAPIX return over 5 years is better than : 11.56 vs. MLLBX (6.35).
| FAPIX | MLLBX | FAPIX / MLLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.45 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.63 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.907 | 5.065 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 1000 | 200,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 545M | 329% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.20 | 2.72 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 3.44 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.32 | 8.08 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.56 | 6.35 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement