Ad is loading...
FAPIX vs MLLBX
FAPIX vs MLLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAPIX vs. MLLBX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAPIX is a Hold and MLLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.71B vs. MLLBX (551M). FAPIX pays higher dividends than MLLBX: FAPIX (3.19) vs MLLBX (2.79). FAPIX was incepted earlier than MLLBX: FAPIX (5 years) vs MLLBX (20 years). MLLBX (1.63) is less costly to investors than FAPIX (0.05). FAPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. MLLBX (9.00). MLLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAPIX: MLLBX (1000) vs FAPIX (2000000000). FAPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.85 vs. MLLBX (3.39).
| FAPIX | MLLBX | FAPIX / MLLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.45 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.63 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.657 | 1.490 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 1000 | 200,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 551M | 310% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 2.79 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.85 | 3.39 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.44 | 5.00 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 11.50 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers