Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAPIX vs MLLGX
FAPIX vs MLLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAPIX vs. MLLGX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAPIX is a Hold and MLLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. MLLGX (545M). FAPIX (3.20) and MLLGX (3.20) have matching dividends . FAPIX was incepted earlier than MLLGX: FAPIX (5 years) vs MLLGX (20 years). MLLGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FAPIX (0.05). FAPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. MLLGX (5.00). MLLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAPIX: MLLGX (0) vs FAPIX (2000000000). FAPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. MLLGX (3.96). FAPIX return over 5 years is better than : 11.56 vs. MLLGX (9.14).
| FAPIX | MLLGX | FAPIX / MLLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.95 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.13 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.907 | 5.371 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 545M | 329% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.20 | 3.20 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 3.96 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.32 | 9.81 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.56 | 9.14 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement