Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASCX vs GSGPX
FASCX vs GSGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASCX vs. GSGPX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASCX is a Buy and GSGPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSGPX has more cash in the bank: 4.87B vs. FASCX (524M). FASCX pays higher dividends than GSGPX: FASCX (5.19) vs GSGPX (1.13). FASCX was incepted earlier than GSGPX: FASCX (12 years) vs GSGPX (7 years). FASCX (3.53) is less costly to investors than GSGPX (0.82). FASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.70 vs. GSGPX (179.00). GSGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FASCX: GSGPX (0) vs FASCX (1000). GSGPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.55 vs. FASCX (1.02). GSGPX return over 5 years is better than : 22.24 vs. FASCX (4.20).
| FASCX | GSGPX | FASCX / GSGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 0.73 | 437% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.53 | 0.82 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.087 | 3.210 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 524M | 4.87B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.19 | 1.13 | 459% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.02 | 5.55 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.14 | 22.06 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.20 | 22.24 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement