Ad is loading...
FASCX vs GSGPX
FASCX vs GSGPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASCX vs. GSGPX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASCX is a StrongBuy and GSGPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSGPX has more cash in the bank: 4.7B vs. FASCX (519M). FASCX pays higher dividends than GSGPX: FASCX (5.25) vs GSGPX (1.15). FASCX was incepted earlier than GSGPX: FASCX (12 years) vs GSGPX (7 years). FASCX (3.53) is less costly to investors than GSGPX (0.86). FASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.70 vs. GSGPX (179.00). GSGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FASCX: GSGPX (0) vs FASCX (1000). GSGPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.41 vs. FASCX (-0.32). GSGPX return over 5 years is better than : 20.23 vs. FASCX (4.07).
| FASCX | GSGPX | FASCX / GSGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 0.73 | 437% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.53 | 0.86 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.285 | 0.401 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 519M | 4.7B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.25 | 1.15 | 457% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.32 | 3.41 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.74 | 18.48 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.07 | 20.23 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.21 | N/A | - |