Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASIX vs FTAWX
FASIX vs FTAWX Comparison
Open Charts FASIX vs FTAWX
Fidelity Asset Manager 20%
Price$13.78
Change-$0.05 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% A
Price$13.76
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
FASIX vs FTAWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASIX vs. FTAWX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASIX is a Buy and FTAWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FASIX (5.44B) and FTAWX (5.44B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FASIX pays higher dividends than FTAWX: FASIX (3.24) vs FTAWX (3.00). FASIX was incepted earlier than FTAWX: FASIX (33 years) vs FTAWX (19 years). FTAWX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FASIX (0.49). FASIX (24.00) and FTAWX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. FASIX (0) and FTAWX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FASIX (500) and FTAWX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FASIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.04 vs. FTAWX (5.68). FASIX return over 5 years is better than : 13.70 vs. FTAWX (12.01).
| FASIX | FTAWX | FASIX / FTAWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.77 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.77 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.205 | 3.038 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 5.44B | 5.44B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 3.00 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.04 | 5.68 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.41 | 10.37 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.70 | 12.01 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.34 | 23.44 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement