Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASPX vs JVMCX
FASPX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FASPX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies M
Price$48.60
Change-$0.46 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.89
Change-$0.18 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.26B
FASPX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASPX vs. JVMCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASPX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. FASPX (1.72B). FASPX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FASPX (0.39) vs JVMCX (0.00). FASPX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FASPX (39 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FASPX (1.34). FASPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FASPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FASPX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.09 vs. FASPX (-6.56). FASPX return over 5 years is better than : 60.75 vs. JVMCX (42.94).
| FASPX | JVMCX | FASPX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.85 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.86 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.807 | 10.949 | 44% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 24.3B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.56 | -2.09 | 313% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.60 | 26.63 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.75 | 42.94 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.45 | 41.72 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement