Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASPX vs JVMCX
FASPX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FASPX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies M
Price$46.34
Change+$0.42 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.16
Change+$0.29 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.33B
FASPX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASPX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASPX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.3B vs. FASPX (1.7B). FASPX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FASPX (0.41) vs JVMCX (0.00). FASPX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FASPX (39 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FASPX (1.34). FASPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FASPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FASPX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.07 vs. FASPX (-10.95). FASPX return over 5 years is better than : 66.85 vs. JVMCX (48.31).
| FASPX | JVMCX | FASPX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.87 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.88 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.901 | 6.206 | -31% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 22.3B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.95 | -4.07 | 269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.64 | 19.18 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.85 | 48.31 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.28 | 32.19 | 32% |