Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASPX vs JVMCX
FASPX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FASPX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies M
Price$45.37
Change+$0.67 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.48
Change+$0.26 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.72B
FASPX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASPX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASPX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. FASPX (1.65B). FASPX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FASPX (0.43) vs JVMCX (0.00). FASPX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FASPX (39 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FASPX (1.34). FASPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FASPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FASPX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.20 vs. FASPX (-8.69). FASPX return over 5 years is better than : 73.47 vs. JVMCX (54.53).
| FASPX | JVMCX | FASPX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.87 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.88 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.508 | 3.636 | -124% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 21.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.69 | -2.20 | 395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.46 | 13.62 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.47 | 54.53 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.42 | 30.79 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement