Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASPX vs JVMCX
FASPX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FASPX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies M
Price$44.02
Change+$0.54 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.03
Change+$0.25 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.45B
FASPX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASPX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASPX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. FASPX (1.65B). FASPX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FASPX (0.43) vs JVMCX (0.00). FASPX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FASPX (39 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FASPX (1.34). FASPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). FASPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FASPX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.66 vs. FASPX (-12.80). FASPX return over 5 years is better than : 48.62 vs. JVMCX (33.39).
| FASPX | JVMCX | FASPX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.87 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.88 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.114 | 1.897 | -375% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 21.5B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.80 | -4.66 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.60 | 1.47 | -244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.62 | 33.39 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.74 | 25.96 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers