FAT
Price
$1.88
Change
+$0.05 (+2.73%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
33.71M
54 days until earnings call
FWRG
Price
$18.59
Change
-$0.07 (-0.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAT vs FWRG

Header iconFAT vs FWRG Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs FWRGBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$1.88
Change+$0.05 (+2.73%)
Volume$22.97K
Capitalization33.71M
First Watch Restaurant Group
Price$18.59
Change-$0.07 (-0.38%)
Volume$983.16K
Capitalization1.14B
FAT vs FWRG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. FWRG commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Buy and FWRG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $1.88 vs. FWRG: $18.59)
Brand notoriety: FAT and FWRG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 38% vs. FWRG: 99%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $33.71M vs. FWRG: $1.14B
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $33.71M. FWRG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFWRG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FWRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FWRG is a better buy in the long-term than FAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FWRG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FWRG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the short-term than FWRG.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +3.87% price change this week, while FWRG (@Restaurants) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWRG($1.14B) has a higher market cap than FAT($33.7M). FWRG YTD gains are higher at: -0.107 vs. FAT (-36.573). FWRG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 93.7M vs. FAT (-34.51M). FWRG has more cash in the bank: 19.2M vs. FAT (7.65M). FWRG has less debt than FAT: FWRG (959M) vs FAT (1.49B). FWRG has higher revenues than FAT: FWRG (773M) vs FAT (578M).
FATFWRGFAT / FWRG
Capitalization33.7M1.14B3%
EBITDA-34.51M93.7M-37%
Gain YTD-36.573-0.10734,030%
P/E RatioN/A103.28-
Revenue578M773M75%
Total Cash7.65M19.2M40%
Total Debt1.49B959M155%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATFWRG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSZIX17.70N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Z
NRAAX53.31N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Quality Equity A
FOCIX14.73N/A
N/A
Fairholme Focused Income
LGOSX29.50N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R4
SHDPX9.83N/A
N/A
American Beacon Shapiro SMID Cap Eq Inv

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
-0.38%
FRSH - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
BJRI - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
CAKE - FWRG
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
KRUS - FWRG
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
DIN - FWRG
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More