FAT
Price
$2.36
Change
-$0.02 (-0.84%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
42.59M
33 days until earnings call
RICK
Price
$38.88
Change
+$0.29 (+0.75%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
341.99M
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAT vs RICK

Header iconFAT vs RICK Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs RICKBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.36
Change-$0.02 (-0.84%)
Volume$25.4K
Capitalization42.59M
RCI Hospitality Holdings
Price$38.88
Change+$0.29 (+0.75%)
Volume$67.04K
Capitalization341.99M
FAT vs RICK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. RICK commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Buy and RICK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $2.38 vs. RICK: $38.87)
Brand notoriety: FAT and RICK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 50% vs. RICK: 159%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $42.59M vs. RICK: $341.99M
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $42.59M. RICK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $341.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRICK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RICK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RICK is a better buy in the long-term than FAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RICK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • RICK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FAT and RICK are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.48% price change this week, while RICK (@Restaurants) price change was -1.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

RICK is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.34% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RICK($342M) has a higher market cap than FAT($42.6M). FAT YTD gains are higher at: -19.785 vs. RICK (-32.141). RICK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.7M vs. FAT (-20.55M). RICK has less debt than FAT: RICK (271M) vs FAT (1.48B). FAT has higher revenues than RICK: FAT (583M) vs RICK (287M).
FATRICKFAT / RICK
Capitalization42.6M342M12%
EBITDA-20.55M39.7M-52%
Gain YTD-19.785-32.14162%
P/E RatioN/A45.20-
Revenue583M287M203%
Total Cash12.2MN/A-
Total Debt1.48B271M547%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT vs RICK: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
RICK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7956
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6366
SMR RATING
1..100
10087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7882
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1008
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAT's Valuation (2) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RICK (63) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that FAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RICK (66) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to RICK’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's SMR Rating (87) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as FAT (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew similarly to FAT’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RICK (82) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to RICK’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAT (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew significantly faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATRICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSTKX33.21N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
FCCGX24.43N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth C
NWHOX28.82N/A
N/A
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci A
HEMRX10.30N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets N
GQJPX11.44N/A
N/A
GQG Partners Intl Qual Val Fd Inv