FATBB
Price
$2.49
Change
-$0.02 (-0.80%)
Updated
Sep 26, 12:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
36.59M
RTBRF
Price
$1.69
Change
+$0.20 (+13.42%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
216.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBB vs RTBRF

Header iconFATBB vs RTBRF Comparison
Open Charts FATBB vs RTBRFBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.49
Change-$0.02 (-0.80%)
Volume$467
Capitalization36.59M
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$1.69
Change+$0.20 (+13.42%)
Volume$200
Capitalization216.23M
FATBB vs RTBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FATBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBB vs. RTBRF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBB is a Buy and RTBRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBB: $2.51 vs. RTBRF: $1.69)
Brand notoriety: FATBB and RTBRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBB: 86% vs. RTBRF: 8%
Market capitalization -- FATBB: $36.59M vs. RTBRF: $216.23M
FATBB [@Restaurants] is valued at $36.59M. RTBRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $216.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $215.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FATBB and RTBRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTBRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATBB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RTBRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RTBRF is a better buy in the short-term than FATBB.

Price Growth

FATBB (@Restaurants) experienced а -2.60% price change this week, while RTBRF (@Restaurants) price change was +13.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.37% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTBRF($216M) has a higher market cap than FATBB($36.6M). RTBRF YTD gains are higher at: 7.834 vs. FATBB (-9.679). RTBRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 160M vs. FATBB (-34.51M). RTBRF has higher revenues than FATBB: RTBRF (1.41B) vs FATBB (578M).
FATBBRTBRFFATBB / RTBRF
Capitalization36.6M216M17%
EBITDA-34.51M160M-22%
Gain YTD-9.6797.834-124%
P/E RatioN/A13.95-
Revenue578M1.41B41%
Total Cash7.65MN/A-
Total Debt1.49BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTBRF: Fundamental Ratings
RTBRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBBRTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDCEX15.54N/A
N/A
Columbia Disciplined Core C
NEFSX48.54N/A
N/A
Natixis US Equity Opportunities A
TSCIX13.40N/A
N/A
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Z
BUIBX21.60N/A
N/A
Buffalo Flexible Allocation Inst
MCSCX10.96-0.12
-1.08%
M3Sixty Small Cap Growth

FATBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBB and CAVA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBB and CAVA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBB
1D Price
Change %
FATBB100%
-1.07%
CAVA - FATBB
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
SHAK - FATBB
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
GTIM - FATBB
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
FAT - FATBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
PBPB - FATBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More

RTBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTBRF and NROM have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTBRF and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTBRF
1D Price
Change %
RTBRF100%
+13.62%
NROM - RTBRF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - RTBRF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
SIRZF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - RTBRF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
More