FATBB
Price
$2.70
Change
-$0.03 (-1.10%)
Updated
Jul 25, 03:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
43.69M
RTBRF
Price
$1.79
Change
+$0.17 (+10.49%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
224.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBB vs RTBRF

Header iconFATBB vs RTBRF Comparison
Open Charts FATBB vs RTBRFBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.70
Change-$0.03 (-1.10%)
Volume$100
Capitalization43.69M
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$1.79
Change+$0.17 (+10.49%)
Volume$150
Capitalization224.51M
FATBB vs RTBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FATBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBB vs. RTBRF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBB is a Hold and RTBRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBB: $2.73 vs. RTBRF: $1.79)
Brand notoriety: FATBB and RTBRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBB: 125% vs. RTBRF: 22%
Market capitalization -- FATBB: $43.69M vs. RTBRF: $224.51M
FATBB [@Restaurants] is valued at $43.69M. RTBRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $224.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $210.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FATBB and RTBRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTBRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATBB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RTBRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FATBB is a better buy in the short-term than RTBRF.

Price Growth

FATBB (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.85% price change this week, while RTBRF (@Restaurants) price change was +10.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

FATBB is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.25% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTBRF($225M) has a higher market cap than FATBB($43.7M). RTBRF YTD gains are higher at: 14.331 vs. FATBB (-1.893). RTBRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 157M vs. FATBB (-20.55M). RTBRF has higher revenues than FATBB: RTBRF (1.37B) vs FATBB (583M).
FATBBRTBRFFATBB / RTBRF
Capitalization43.7M225M19%
EBITDA-20.55M157M-13%
Gain YTD-1.89314.331-13%
P/E RatioN/A14.08-
Revenue583M1.37B43%
Total Cash12.2MN/A-
Total Debt1.48BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTBRF: Fundamental Ratings
RTBRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBBRTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASQAX16.19N/A
N/A
American Century Small Company A
IGHAX12.34N/A
N/A
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol Port A
MXMDX21.77N/A
N/A
Empower S&P Mid Cap 400® Index Inv
FHUMX15.43N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes US SMID Institutional
JSEAX21.98-0.17
-0.77%
JPMorgan International Equity A

FATBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBB and SHAK have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBB and SHAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBB
1D Price
Change %
FATBB100%
+4.18%
SHAK - FATBB
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
CAVA - FATBB
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.92%
GTIM - FATBB
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.77%
FAT - FATBB
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
PBPB - FATBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
More

RTBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTBRF and NROM have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTBRF and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTBRF
1D Price
Change %
RTBRF100%
N/A
NROM - RTBRF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
FWRG - RTBRF
9%
Poorly correlated
-7.20%
SIRZF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - RTBRF
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.18%
More