FATBP
Price
$3.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
TXRH
Price
$184.66
Change
-$3.82 (-2.03%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
12.25B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBP vs TXRH

Header iconFATBP vs TXRH Comparison
Open Charts FATBP vs TXRHBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$3.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Texas Roadhouse
Price$184.66
Change-$3.82 (-2.03%)
Volume$571.27K
Capitalization12.25B
FATBP vs TXRH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TXRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBP vs. TXRH commentary
Jul 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBP is a Hold and TXRH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBP: $3.16 vs. TXRH: $184.66)
Brand notoriety: FATBP and TXRH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBP: 46% vs. TXRH: 57%
Market capitalization -- FATBP: $0 vs. TXRH: $12.25B
FATBP [@Restaurants] is valued at $0. TXRH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $12.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $214.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTXRH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TXRH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TXRH is a better buy in the long-term than FATBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TXRH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATBP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TXRH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FATBP is a better buy in the short-term than TXRH.

Price Growth

FATBP (@Restaurants) experienced а +3.27% price change this week, while TXRH (@Restaurants) price change was -1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

FATBP is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

TXRH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.62% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TXRH YTD gains are higher at: 3.111 vs. FATBP (-65.186). TXRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 705M vs. FATBP (-20.55M). TXRH has more cash in the bank: 221M vs. FATBP (12.2M). TXRH has less debt than FATBP: TXRH (908M) vs FATBP (1.48B). TXRH has higher revenues than FATBP: TXRH (5.5B) vs FATBP (583M).
FATBPTXRHFATBP / TXRH
CapitalizationN/A12.3B-
EBITDA-20.55M705M-3%
Gain YTD-65.1863.111-2,095%
P/E RatioN/A28.50-
Revenue583M5.5B11%
Total Cash12.2M221M6%
Total Debt1.48B908M163%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TXRH: Fundamental Ratings
TXRH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBPTXRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TXRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAT24.73N/A
N/A
Saratoga Investment Corp
CLDL13.68-0.04
-0.31%
Direxion Daily Cld Cmptng Bl 2X Shs ETF
JMM6.28-0.04
-0.63%
NUVEEN MULTI-MARKET Income FUND
CCMG29.33-0.35
-1.19%
CCM Global Equity ETF
RSST23.41-0.44
-1.84%
Return Stacked® US Stocks & Mgd Futs ETF

FATBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBP and CNNE have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBP and CNNE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBP
1D Price
Change %
FATBP100%
N/A
CNNE - FATBP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
FATBB - FATBP
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RICK - FATBP
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
ARCO - FATBP
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
TXRH - FATBP
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
More

TXRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TXRH has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TXRH jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TXRH
1D Price
Change %
TXRH100%
-2.03%
CAKE - TXRH
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
DRI - TXRH
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
EAT - TXRH
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
BJRI - TXRH
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
SHAK - TXRH
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
More