FATBP
Price
$2.19
Change
-$0.02 (-0.90%)
Updated
Aug 28, 03:45 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
TXRH
Price
$172.44
Change
-$2.40 (-1.37%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.45B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBP vs TXRH

Header iconFATBP vs TXRH Comparison
Open Charts FATBP vs TXRHBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.90%)
Volume$152
CapitalizationN/A
Texas Roadhouse
Price$172.44
Change-$2.40 (-1.37%)
Volume$41.93K
Capitalization11.45B
FATBP vs TXRH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TXRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBP vs. TXRH commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBP is a StrongBuy and TXRH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBP: $2.19 vs. TXRH: $172.38)
Brand notoriety: FATBP and TXRH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBP: 137% vs. TXRH: 131%
Market capitalization -- FATBP: $0 vs. TXRH: $11.45B
FATBP [@Restaurants] is valued at $0. TXRH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $11.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTXRH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TXRH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TXRH is a better buy in the long-term than FATBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TXRH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TXRH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TXRH is a better buy in the short-term than FATBP.

Price Growth

FATBP (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while TXRH (@Restaurants) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

TXRH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.86% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TXRH YTD gains are higher at: -2.372 vs. FATBP (-75.653). TXRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 716M vs. FATBP (-34.51M). TXRH has more cash in the bank: 177M vs. FATBP (7.65M). TXRH has less debt than FATBP: TXRH (923M) vs FATBP (1.49B). TXRH has higher revenues than FATBP: TXRH (5.67B) vs FATBP (578M).
FATBPTXRHFATBP / TXRH
CapitalizationN/A11.5B-
EBITDA-34.51M716M-5%
Gain YTD-75.653-2.3723,189%
P/E RatioN/A26.28-
Revenue578M5.67B10%
Total Cash7.65M177M4%
Total Debt1.49B923M162%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TXRH: Fundamental Ratings
TXRH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
11

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBPTXRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TXRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDEC41.220.08
+0.19%
Innovator U.S. Eq Power Buffer ETF - Dec
DSCF23.800.01
+0.03%
Discipline Fund ETF
RXD11.78N/A
+0.02%
ProShares UltraShort Health Care
BENJ51.16N/A
N/A
Horizon Landmark ETF
IAPR29.76-0.04
-0.15%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF Apr

FATBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBP and CNNE have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBP and CNNE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBP
1D Price
Change %
FATBP100%
-4.26%
CNNE - FATBP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
FATBB - FATBP
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
RICK - FATBP
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
ARCO - FATBP
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
TXRH - FATBP
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
More

TXRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TXRH has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TXRH jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TXRH
1D Price
Change %
TXRH100%
+0.07%
CAKE - TXRH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
BJRI - TXRH
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
DRI - TXRH
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
SHAK - TXRH
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
EAT - TXRH
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
More