FATE
Price
$2.54
Change
-$0.11 (-4.15%)
Updated
Dec 4, 6:59 PM EST
84 days until earnings call
HOWL
Price
$2.75
Change
+$0.20 (+7.84%)
Updated
Dec 4, 6:59 PM EST
107 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare trend and price FATE vs HOWL

Header iconFATE vs HOWL Comparison
Open Charts FATE vs HOWLBanner chart's image
Fate Therapeutics
Price$2.54
Change-$0.11 (-4.15%)
Volume$557.04K
CapitalizationN/A
Werewolf Therapeutics
Price$2.75
Change+$0.20 (+7.84%)
Volume$54.83K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FATE vs HOWL Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
FATE vs. HOWL commentary
Dec 05, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATE is a StrongBuy and HOWL is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2023
Stock price -- (FATE: $2.54 vs. HOWL: $2.74)
Brand notoriety: FATE and HOWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATE: 55% vs. HOWL: 8%
Market capitalization -- FATE: $224.81M vs. HOWL: $91.2M
FATE [@Biotechnology] is valued at $224.81M. HOWL’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $91.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $464.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FATE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HOWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FATE and HOWL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HOWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FATE and HOWL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FATE (@Biotechnology) experienced а +11.40% price change this week, while HOWL (@Biotechnology) price change was +8.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +5.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +26.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

FATE is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2024.

HOWL is expected to report earnings on Mar 21, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+5.40% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FATE with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for HOWL with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FATE($225M) has a higher market cap than HOWL($91.2M). HOWL YTD gains are higher at: 33.659 vs. FATE (-74.827). HOWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -39M vs. FATE (-188.62M). FATE has more cash in the bank: 350M vs. HOWL (130M). HOWL has less debt than FATE: HOWL (52.2M) vs FATE (105M). FATE has higher revenues than HOWL: FATE (106M) vs HOWL (25.7M).
FATEHOWLFATE / HOWL
Capitalization225M91.2M247%
EBITDA-188.62M-39M484%
Gain YTD-74.82733.659-222%
P/E RatioN/A0.39-
Revenue106M25.7M412%
Total Cash350M130M269%
Total Debt105M52.2M201%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FATE: Fundamental Ratings
FATE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATEHOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSVIX22.710.18
+0.80%
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst2
MOJAX11.230.01
+0.09%
Donoghue Forlines Momentum A
FASIX13.04-0.03
-0.23%
Fidelity Asset Manager® 20%
HFLGX10.88-0.05
-0.46%
Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth Inv
KTCCX15.40-0.16
-1.03%
DWS Science and Technology C

FATE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FATE has been loosely correlated with GRPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FATE jumps, then GRPH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATE
1D Price
Change %
FATE100%
-4.15%
GRPH - FATE
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
ATAI - FATE
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
CVAC - FATE
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
OCUL - FATE
51%
Loosely correlated
+25.37%
PIRS - FATE
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.85%
More

HOWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HOWL and EDIT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HOWL and EDIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOWL
1D Price
Change %
HOWL100%
+7.45%
EDIT - HOWL
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
FOLD - HOWL
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
FATE - HOWL
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.15%
BEAM - HOWL
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
AMTI - HOWL
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
More